In a popular YouTube video, Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra has been dubbed a completely original reimagining of indigenous supernatural creatures, and it has been said that, unlike Minnal Murali, it is not inspired by any Hollywood film. But that is not true. Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra is clearly inspired by several Hollywood films.
Let us start
with how Chandra obtained her vampire powers. The film does not draw from
domestic mythology but instead relies on the clichéd trope of a bat bite
leading to a viral infection. This origin story for vampires has been used in
countless Hollywood films. A prime example is the Underworld franchise, often
seen as the poster child of female-led supernatural action films, where the
vampire species originates from plague-infected bats biting an immortal,
creating the first vampire.
Similarly,
in Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra, a normal child is bitten by a bat and becomes a
vampire, who later in life is known as Kalliyankattu Neeli. However, this does
not make the origin story original. It could have felt more authentic if it had
been rooted in domestic mythology. Other examples of bat-caused vampirism
include Daybreakers (2009), Morbius (2022), and many more. In this case, the
name Kalliyankattu Neeli is the only factor linking this character to the
domestic mythology of Kerala.
Another
borrowed element is the trope of killing a vampire by staking the heart, one of
the most overused ideas in vampire films and series. The scene in Lokah Chapter
1: Chandra, where Kadamattathu Kathanar stakes Chandra and she is later revived
when the stake is removed, is clearly inspired by The
Vampire Diaries and its spin-off, The Originals. The original vampires
can be revived in that universe if a normal wooden stake is removed, while only
white oak can permanently kill them.
So, it is
clear that Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra draws inspiration from Hollywood. This is
not a bad thing, but it is important to acknowledge that there are outside
influences, just like in Minnal Murali. It is to be noted that this opinion is
not a personal attack on the creator of the video mentioned above; we are
simply pointing out facts that debunk its claims.
No comments:
Post a Comment